The writer, who recently published a column in the Los Angeles Times, warned of the health and human service ministers of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. He gave a headline and said he omitted some of his arguments to promote it. Kennedy.
Patrick Sover-SHIONG, a billionaire owner of the newspaper, posted works on social media. Social media “Trump’s suspension of health can be paid if you promote real reform.” Soon, Shion added his comment as a part of the Pro-Kennedy post, as the president’s choice is “our best opportunity.”
Eric Reinhart, the author of the work, said in an interview with Politico that he advocates the “populist” approach to health care, but has not argued Kennedy’s confirmation. He added that the late change in the work, especially the headline and the choice of photography, said that the choice of headlines and photographs that did not see or approved before publishing occurred in a way that distorted and changed the intended meaning of his story.
Reinhart said, “The shipwreck of RFK JR will not fix public health. “Voting for RFK JR. is a vote for confusion. The vote for confusion is the opposite of the essential public system building that I insist on OPED and claim mass death.”
In the statement, the spokesman of the Los Angeles Times withdrew the claim that he did not approve the work before this work was published.
Hillary Manning, vice president of communication, said, “Editor of opinions work with OP-ED contributors to edit the work to edit the work.” “OP-ED works are not published as edited without the author’s permission. This includes OP-ED written by Eric Reinhart. ”
Reinhart, a psychoanalyticist, a social psychiatrist, and a political anthropologist who wrote for other media organizations, said he was very familiar with the publishing process and understood what the editors ultimately said and ultimately said. Control the headline and photos.
Some changes in the work, which included a cut about the part that clearly informed Kennedy’s wrong choice for HHS, would have been fine if the work was executed with his proposed headline.
But instead, he left Kennedy’s photos in a more ambiguous headline and his confirmation hearing, and Reinhart thinks that “I am very worried that this is actually a deliberate manipulation.”
Rhineheart has the possibility of actually supporting Kennedy rather than a warning about the threat he raised, demanding a new public health management model in the United States.
Reinhart said, “It is a background of known records and known records of the interference and editing process of the newspaper. Tension has been built among employees through the ownership of the paper for several years.
Soon on Tuesday, Shiong gave Kennedy entirely supporting X and said:
“I was worried about the cause of toxins and cancer,” he added. “As a doctor scientist, I hope he will be confirmed tomorrow.”
Reinhart believed that the contract or contract was not violated by his OP-ED process, but considering Kennedy’s hearing, the overall situation was “not consistent with the editorial spirit.”
“A gloomy public health problem that develops as if OP-ED is published,” he said. Qualified danger? ‘”
