A recent flight passenger revealed in X’s post that he saved hundreds of dollars using a rather “dangerous” hack.
California-based real estate investor Mike Bolen has racked up more than 6.2 million views on his social media pages after sharing his “wild” way to buy plane tickets.
Bolen discovered that instead of booking a direct flight to St. Louis for $564, he could buy a ticket to Atlanta with a layover in St. Louis for just $198.
Traveler’s rapid flight booking hack sparks debate to avoid dreaded middle seats
“Why can’t I just bring my carry-on and get off the plane at STL? Yes!” he wrote on X alongside a photo from the airline’s website.
Bolen tried the hack and “it worked out without a hitch,” he told Fox News Digital.
The hack may be new to Bolen, who noted that he’s never seen anyone test it before, but it turns out the hack has been around for a while.
Mum’s plane seat hack sparks debate. SOLO FLYERS are ‘unbearable’
This is often referred to as “single-use” or “beyond the point” ticketing, according to Gary Leff, a Texas-based travel industry expert and author of the blog “View From the Wing.” He told Fox News Digital via email.
In Leff’s blog, he noted that people book flights with a connection that passes through their intended destination, but disembark at a layover instead of taking a second flight.
Since direct flights generally cost more than connecting tickets, the purpose of a “single ticket” is to save on the overall cost of the flight.
“The ethics of single-use ticketing have been debated for decades. “An airline that believes that a flight from A to B to C is a fundamentally different product than a flight from A to B ends up buying one and consuming the other,” Leff wrote.
‘Seat Squatter REVERSE’ is sparking reactions on social media with its surprising air travel plot twist.
“And that goes against the common sense notion that if you buy seats on two flights, it’s up to you what you do with it. “This is all a result of complex pricing that regular customers find confusing and unfair to begin with,” he added.
Leff points out that while the cost of a flight may be lower than a direct flight, there can be real risks when attempting this travel hack.
For example, you may need to check your carry-on baggage when boarding. Additionally, airlines may automatically reroute you to a new route based on what the airline determines is the destination printed on your original ticket.
Leff added that airlines may actually cancel mileage accounts or issue travel bans on passengers.
Airport travelers are enjoying ‘check-in chicken’ in the latest flight booking trend
“The airline may close your frequent flyer account or ban you from flying with that airline in the future. It’s not something to do every week, but something to consider occasionally,” Leff wrote on his blog.
“If you’re going to do one-time ticketing, at least consider accruing your miles to a frequent flyer account with a partner airline. That doesn’t give you any protection, but why not make it easier to track them?” Lev pointed out.
The hack has gained attention in recent years, with some airlines going after Skiplagged.com, an “airfare search engine for cheap flights that reveals ticketed trips to hidden cities,” according to the website.
The airfare site said on its homepage, “United sued us because our flights were so cheap…”
Fox News Digital has reached out to Skiplagged.com and United Airlines for comment.
For more lifestyle articles, visit www.foxnews.com/lifestyle.
“It’s unclear how much more widespread this practice has become because it hasn’t been disclosed by the airlines,” Leff told Fox News Digital.
“But it’s easier than ever to do so because you no longer need to buy a round-trip ticket to get the best fare (it works best when you book one-way tickets).”
Looking at the possible risks associated with flight hacking, some people have pointed out that there are two views regarding the ethics of this procedure.
Click here to subscribe to our lifestyle newsletter.
Either you “agreed” to the airline’s “contract of carriage” and broke the contract when purchasing your ticket, or the “contract of carriage” had no significant effect, “making the airline’s view contradictory to common sense morality,” Leff wrote. On his website.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
“There are practical/consequentialist considerations that can lead to discontinuing the practice, or at least not engaging in it as often,” he said.